Key result
Cardiac pacemaker placement in patients with high cervical spinal cord injury eliminated cardiovascular instability events, reducing them from 35 pre-placement to 0 post-placement (p=0.0135).
Why the study?
Does cardiac pacemaker placement reduce cardiovascular instability events in patients with high cervical spinal cord injury and life-threatening bradycardia?
Observational (n=106)
No
Does cardiac pacemaker placement reduce cardiovascular instability events in patients with high cervical spinal cord injury and life-threatening bradycardia?
Early cardiac pacemaker placement safely and effectively eliminates life-threatening cardiovascular instability events in patients with high cervical spinal cord injury.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support early pacemaker use in high cervical SCI with bradycardia; hypothesis-generating, requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: High cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) can cause life-threatening bradycardia from autonomic instability that may be resistant to pharmacologic interventions. Placement of a cardiac pacemaker, traditionally reserved for patients refractory to drug therapy, may be lifesaving. METHODS: Our Level I trauma center registry found all patients with CSCI from 2003 to 2009. A retrospective chart review identified major events involving the circulatory system: those exhibiting bradycardia (minor, heart rate 40-60/min; major, heart rate <40/min), hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg), asystole, and cardiac arrest. Records of pharmacological interventions (e.g., atropine) and details of pacemaker placement (e.g., timing and any complications) were reviewed. Statistical differences were determined by Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with p < 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: Of the 106 patients with CSCI, 15 (14%) had bradycardia and 7 of those (47%) underwent cardiac pacemaker placement. Six of seven patients had reviewable data. A total of 35 events occurred in these six patients before pacemaker placement. Subsequent to placement, there were zero events of cardiovascular instability (p = 0.0135). Major bradycardic episodes were reduced from 9 to 0 (p = 0.0206) and incidents requiring atropine administration from 9 to 0 (p = 0.0197). Four survived; two patients died from pulmonary complications. There were no complications related to pacemaker insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CSCI life-threatening complications of bradycardia benefit from early placement of a cardiac pacemaker. Early stabilization may facilitate transfer out of the intensive care unit, mobilization, physical therapy, rehabilitation, and outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moerman et al. (2011) conducted an observational in High cervical spinal cord injury with life-threatening bradycardia (n=106). Cardiac pacemaker placement vs. Pre-pacemaker placement (baseline) was evaluated on Events of cardiovascular instability (p=0.0135). Cardiac pacemaker placement in patients with high cervical spinal cord injury eliminated cardiovascular instability events, reducing them from 35 pre-placement to 0 post-placement (p=0.0135).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: