Why the study?
Interval training is widely prescribed to improve health and cardiovascular function, but the effects of different training intensities on hemodynamic and autonomic function in older adults required verification.
Does eight weeks of interval training improve hemodynamic and autonomic function in physically active older men?
Does eight weeks of interval training improve hemodynamic and autonomic function in physically active older men?
Eight weeks of interval training performed twice a week was not sufficient to improve hemodynamic and autonomic variables in physically active older men.
No significant hemodynamic or autonomic changes after 8-week interval training in active older men; challenges short-protocol efficacy and leaves optimal dosing open.
Background: Interval training is a method with high acceptance in prescription to increase health and can be an essential intervener in improving cardiovascular function. Objective: This study aimed to verify the effects of eight weeks of interval training with different intensities on hemodynamic and autonomic function, which were assessed through resting heart rate, blood pressure, dual product, and heart rate variability. Methods: The sample consisted of 24 older men (age: 68.8 ± 6.8 years, body mass: 74.4 ± 18.1 kg, height: 1.70 ± 0.8 m; BMI: 25.1 ± 2, 2) who were physically active. Participants were randomized into 3 experimental groups: training group A (TGA, n = 8), training group B (TGB, n = 8) and control group (CG, n = 8). For trained groups, interventions were developed twice a week for eight weeks, with an interval of 48 hours between the sessions. The evaluations were carried out at the pre (baseline) and after the eighth week of intervention. The control group did not perform any intervention. The variables were analyzed for 10 minutes with subjects at rest in the sitting position before and after the intervention. Statistics with a significance level of p <0.05 were applied. Results: After the intervention, no statistically significant results were found in the variables assessed (p> 0.05). Conclusion: The intervention was not sufficient to promote statistical differences in hemodynamic and autonomic variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sant’Ana et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: