Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Waseem A. Wania, Zeid Al-Othmanb, Imran Ali*a, Kishwar Saleema & Ming-Fa Hsiehca Department of Chemistry, Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University), New Delhi, Indiab Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Kingdom of Saudi Arabiac Department of Biomedical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung Li, Taiwan* Corresponding author. Email: drimran_ali@yahoo.comAn oxopyrrolidine-based ligand [3-(4-chlorobenzylidine)-5-(5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)pyrrolidin-2-one] was synthesized by coupling pyroglutamic acid with p-chlorobenzaldehyde followed by cyclization with thiosemicarbazide in presence of oxyphosphoryl chloride. Copper, nickel, and ruthenium complexes of the ligand were also synthesized. The electrolytic nature, with octahedral geometries for nickel and ruthenium complexes, was observed, while tetragonally distorted octahedral geometry for copper complex was proposed. The complexes were resistant to dissociation and degradation in 5% DMSO solutions of PBS (pH 7.4). DNA binding constants (Kb) for ligand, copper, nickel, and ruthenium complexes were 1.15 × 105, 1.67 × 105, 1.87 × 105, and 1.007 × 106 M−1, respectively, indicating quite strong binding with DNA. In silico studies also showed that the ligand interacted with DNA mainly through van der Waal’s forces. The docking energy of ligand−DNA adduct was –30.45 kJ M–1, suggesting a good affinity of the reported ligand with DNA. Both the ligand and its complexes were less toxic to RBCs as compared to doxorubicin. All the compounds showed moderate anticancer activities on MCF-7 (wild type) breast cancer cell lines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wani et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: