Resilient modulus tests were performed on five cohesive soils sampled from the subgrades of in-service pavements. The stress at 1% strain in the unconfined compression test (Su1.0%) was found to be a good indicator of the resilient modulus (MR), and an empirical relationship between MRand Su1.0%was obtained. The proposed relationship itself is not affected by the changes in subgrade after construction and, therefore, is applicable to as-compacted and in-service subgrade conditions. Closed-system freeze–thaw tests were also performed and the effect of freeze–thaw on the resilient modulus was studied. There is a negligible effect of freeze–thaw, without ice lens formation, for soils having values of Su1.0%less than 8 psi (55 kPa), while the effect of freeze–thaw increases as the value of Su1.0%increases. For example, a soil with a value of Su1.0%greater than 15 psi (103 kPa) would exhibit more than 50% reduction in resilient modulus due to the effect of freeze–thaw. The resilient modulus of frozen cohesive soil is independent of the repeated deviator stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: