Why the study?
Extracting fetal ECG from maternal abdominal ECG is challenging due to strong interferences and background noise, despite its importance for diagnosing congenital heart defects and fetal distress.
A novel fast adaptive LPCA algorithm effectively extracts fetal ECG from maternal abdominal signals, achieving high QRS detection accuracy and robustness against noise.
May aid research FECG extraction; leaves open clinical validation before practice adoption.
Monitoring fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) is crucial for diagnosing potential congenital heart defects and fetal distress during pregnancy. Due to strong interferences and background noise, it is challenging to extract FECG from maternal abdominal electrocardiogram (AECG). In this article, we propose a novel method for extracting FECG using multiple-channel AECGs. Our approach incorporates canonical correlation analysis (CCA) into the local principal component analysis (LPCA). First, the FECG is preliminarily extracted from multichannel AECGs via CCA approach, which greatly suppresses the maternal interference and retains the waveform details of FECG. However, the extracted signal may still suffer from significant noise. Second, a fast adaptive LPCA algorithm is proposed for denoising purpose, which avoids the computationally expensive eigenvalue decomposition of high dimensional covariance matrix. The convergence of the adaptive LPCA is analyzed based on the deterministic discrete-time (DDT) theory. The proposed algorithm is evaluated on both synthetic signals and real recordings. The simulation results demonstrate the robustness of our method against Gaussian noise, the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of extracted FECG achieves 19.65 dB. The experimental results on real-world dataset further illustrate the outstanding performance of our method in terms of computational load and fetal QRS complex detection accuracy withF₁score of 96.55% on ADFECGDB dataset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: