Annual cutterbar and slotting saw hedging were compared after 3 years. Fruiting was measured as the number of spurs per twig on 3 year old growth, number of spurs flowering and fruiting, and bushels per tree. Integrated light energy quantities were measured for 6- to 14-day periods for various positions within the tree and correlated with fruiting. A hydraulic “slotting saw” mounted on a boom on a fork lift hedged a slot in the side of the tree. By cycling the slots any one position was cut only once every 4 years, permitting the regeneration of fruiting wood and the penetration of light. ‘McIntosh’ apples pruned as 10 ft high hedges with (a) cutterbar and (b) with a slotting saw, show that annual cutterbar hedging reduces the generation of new fruiting spurs, produces a dense outer periphery shading interior spurs and reduces bearing. The slotting saw mechanical pruning technique increases light penetration into the tree, produces nearly 3 times as many new spurs and about a 4-fold increase in the percentage of spurs flowering. Light measurements within the tree indicate that spur leaves require about 50% of available light for suitable flowering. Light values in trees hedged 3 years with the cutterbar were reduced to less than this value within the outer 2 ft of tree canopy where few spurs exist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John C. Cain (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: