Key result
DCD heart transplantation shows similar 1-year mortality to brain-death donation despite transient right heart dysfunction.
Why the study?
Utilization of donation after circulatory death (DCD) hearts could significantly increase donor availability, but hemodynamic and clinical profiles compared to standard brain death donor hearts were not well described.
Does transplantation with hearts donated after circulatory death (DCD) provide similar hemodynamic and clinical outcomes compared to standard of care hearts donated after brain death (DBD) in heart transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=213)
No
Does transplantation with hearts donated after circulatory death (DCD) provide similar hemodynamic and clinical outcomes compared to standard of care hearts donated after brain death (DBD) in heart transplant recipients?
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“This is going be an opportunity for us to continue to really look into this new method. The single biggest problem we have, of course, in heart transplant is just the availability of donor organs. So, I think this is certainly an opportunity to increase donor supply and also reduce wait times.”
“Early patient outcomes are encouraging in our initial single-center institutional experience with DCD heart transplantation using warm machine perfusion. In our experience, this approach to DCD heart protection is effective, supporting the ongoing study of this practice as a predicate to broader adoption.”
DCD heart utilization is associated with transient post-transplant right heart dysfunction but yields short-term clinical outcomes and mortality similar to transplantation using standard DBD hearts.
BACKGROUND: Donor organ demand continues to outpace supply in heart transplantation. Utilization of donation after circulatory death (DCD) hearts could significantly increase heart donor availability for patients with advanced heart failure. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe hemodynamic and clinical profiles of DCD hearts in comparison to standard of care (SOC) hearts donated after brain death (DBD). METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive heart transplant recipients analyzed right heart catheterization measurements, inotrope scores, echocardiograms, and clinical outcomes between DCD and DBD heart recipients. RESULTS: Between April 2016 and February 2022, 47 DCD and 166 SOC hearts were transplanted. Median time from DCD consent to transplant was significantly shorter compared with SOC waiting list time (17 days [6-28 days] vs 70 days [23-240 days]; P < 0.001). Right heart function was significantly impaired in DCD recipients compared with SOC recipients 1 week post-transplant (higher median right atrial pressure (10 mm Hg [8-13 mm Hg] vs 7 mm Hg [5-11 mm Hg]; P < 0.001), higher right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (0.64 [0.54-0.82] vs 0.57 [0.43-0.73]; P = 0.016), and lower pulmonary arterial pulsatility index (1.66 [1.27-2.50] vs 2.52 [1.63-3.82]; P < 0.001), but was similar between groups by 3 weeks post-transplant. DCD and SOC recipient mortality was similar at 30 days (DCD 0 vs SOC 2%; P = 0.29) and 1 year post-transplant (DCD 3% vs SOC 8%; P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: DCD heart utilization is associated with transient post-transplant right heart dysfunction and short-term clinical outcomes otherwise similar to transplantation using DBD hearts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Alessandro et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure requiring heart transplantation (n=213). Hearts donated after circulatory death (DCD) vs. Standard of care (SOC) hearts donated after brain death (DBD) was evaluated on Mortality at 1 year post-transplant (p=0.16). Transplantation of hearts donated after circulatory death was associated with similar 1-year mortality compared to standard of care hearts (3% vs 8%; P=0.16), despite transient right heart dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: