Key result
Multidisciplinary predelivery planning and neonatal resuscitation may improve outcomes in severe fetal cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Primary cardiomyopathies are associated with poor neonatal outcomes and high mortality, and severe cases warrant additional, unique predelivery care planning beyond standard Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines.
Case Report (n=1)
Highlights the need for unique predelivery care planning and potential ECPR consideration in severe fetal cardiomyopathy.
Hypothesis-generating for severe fetal cardiomyopathy; should not change practice without prospective validation.
Primary cardiomyopathies are associated with poor neonatal outcomes, including high mortality rates. Neonatal care of infants with significant prenatal cardiac diagnoses may warrant additional management considerations beyond standard Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines. Many of these management considerations are described in the Neonatal Resuscitation, 9th Edition, which details several congenital cardiac lesions and their delivery room management; still, a prenatal primary cardiomyopathy diagnosis warrants additional, unique predelivery care planning, especially in more severe cases. This case report describes our multidisciplinary team’s approach to predelivery planning and neonatal resuscitation and stabilization of an infant with prenatal diagnosis of severe cardiomyopathy. The case underscores that with continued refinement in patient selection, timing, and technology, a similar approach undertaken in a future case might yield a favorable outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrison et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Severe fetal cardiomyopathy (n=1). Multidisciplinary predelivery planning and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was evaluated. A multidisciplinary approach to predelivery planning and neonatal resuscitation for severe fetal cardiomyopathy may yield favorable outcomes with refined patient selection and technology.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: