Key result
24-h urinary aldosterone measured by cCLIA and sCLIA matches LC-MS/MS diagnostic accuracy for primary aldosteronism.
Why the study?
To compare 24-h urinary excretion of aldosterone measured by competitive and sandwich CLIAs against LC-MS/MS, and evaluate a direct renin concentration-stratified diagnostic strategy for primary aldosteronism.
Does 24-h urinary excretion of aldosterone measured by cCLIA and sCLIA have comparable diagnostic performance to LC-MS/MS for primary aldosteronism in hypertensive inpatients?
Observational (n=705)
Does 24-h urinary excretion of aldosterone measured by cCLIA and sCLIA have comparable diagnostic performance to LC-MS/MS for primary aldosteronism in hypertensive inpatients?
CLIA-based 24-h urinary aldosterone measurements offer comparable diagnostic accuracy to LC-MS/MS for primary aldosteronism, and a direct renin concentration-stratified strategy may aid interpretation.
CLIA urinary aldosterone assays may offer practical alternatives to LC-MS/MS; leaves open routine adoption pending broader validation.
Objectives To compare 24-h urinary excretion of aldosterone (24-h UEA) measured by competitive chemiluminescent immunoassay (cCLIA) and sandwich chemiluminescent immunoassay (sCLIA) with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and to evaluate a direct renin concentration (DRC)-stratified interpretive strategy for primary aldosteronism (PA). Methods We prospectively enrolled 705 hypertensive inpatients, including 105 with PA and 600 with essential hypertension. 24-h UEA was measured by cCLIA, sCLIA, and LC-MS/MS, and DRC was measured by CLIA. Method agreement was assessed using Passing–Bablok regression and Bland–Altman analysis. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), with internal validation by 1,000 outcome-stratified bootstrap resamples. Results Both CLIAs correlated strongly with LC-MS/MS (Spearman r=0.946 for cCLIA and 0.950 for sCLIA). Overall areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.809, 0.814, and 0.812 for cCLIA, sCLIA, and LC-MS/MS, respectively, with no statistically significant differences among the methods. A DRC cutoff of 8.1 mU/L was used to define low-DRC (≤8.1 mU/L) and high-DRC (>8.1 mU/L) subgroups. In the low-DRC subgroup, AUCs were 0.880, 0.879, and 0.881; in the high-DRC subgroup, they were 0.871, 0.878, and 0.859, respectively. Optimism-corrected AUCs remained close to the original estimates. Method-specific high-sensitivity and high-specificity thresholds were used to construct an exploratory DRC-stratified interpretive strategy. Conclusions CLIA-based 24-h UEA measurements showed strong correlation and small mean bias with LC-MS/MS and similar diagnostic discrimination in this cohort. DRC stratification may support method-specific interpretation of 24-h UEA, but the proposed thresholds require prospective external validation before clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Hypertension (Primary aldosteronism) (n=705). 24-h urinary excretion of aldosterone measured by cCLIA and sCLIA vs. LC-MS/MS was evaluated on Diagnostic performance (AUC) for primary aldosteronism. 24-h urinary excretion of aldosterone measured by cCLIA and sCLIA showed similar diagnostic discrimination for primary aldosteronism compared to LC-MS/MS (AUCs 0.809, 0.814, and 0.812).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: