Key result
Male sex is linked to ~4-fold higher odds of a high cardiometabolic risk phenotype.
Why the study?
The study aimed to identify distinct cardiometabolic phenotypes from multiple metabolic risk indicators, assess their associations with sociodemographic characteristics, and evaluate income-related differences to quantify the contribution of observed factors to these disparities.
Are sociodemographic factors associated with distinct cardiometabolic phenotypes in US adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=7,733)
Are sociodemographic factors associated with distinct cardiometabolic phenotypes in US adults?
Odds Ratio: 4 (95% CI 3.4–4.7)
This study highlights that cardiometabolic risk clusters into distinct phenotypes in US adults, with significant disparities driven by sociodemographic factors like sex, age, and education.
May inform sex-specific cardiometabolic screening; leaves open causal mechanisms and need for prospective outcome validation.
Aim The study aims to identify distinct cardiometabolic phenotypes based on multiple metabolic risk indicators, assess their associations with sociodemographic characteristics, and evaluate income‐related differences through cardiometabolic risk using decomposition methods to quantify the contribution of observed factors to these disparities. Materials and Methods A cross‐sectional analytical study was conducted using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011–2018 data. Adults aged 20 years and above with complete cardiometabolic biomarker data were included. Six cardiometabolic indicators including waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, glycated haemoglobin, triglycerides, and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were used to derive latent phenotypes using latent class analysis. Multinomial logistic regression examined associations between sociodemographic factors and phenotype membership. Oaxaca‐Blinder decomposition analysis assessed income‐related disparities in the high cardiometabolic risk phenotype. Results A total of 7733 participants were included in the analysis. A three class model demonstrated optimal fit and identified metabolically healthy (54.9%), hypertension‐hyperglycemia (33.1%) and high cardiometabolic risk (11.9%) phenotypes. The high‐risk phenotype exhibited elevated probabilities of obesity, dyslipidemia and glycaemic abnormalities. Increasing age, male sex, lower income and lower educational attainment were significantly associated with high risk phenotype membership. Decomposition analysis demonstrated modest income‐related disparities, with waist circumference and education contributing the largest explained components. Conclusion Cardiometabolic risk among U.S. adults clusters into three distinct phenotypes associated with sociodemographic and metabolic determinants. These findings highlight the need for integrated strategies targeting early metabolic dysregulation and broader social determinants of health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Unnikrishnan et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiometabolic risk (n=7,733). Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on High cardiometabolic risk phenotype membership (OR 4.00, 95% CI 3.40-4.70). Male sex was significantly associated with a 4-fold higher odds of membership in a high cardiometabolic risk phenotype compared to female sex among US adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: