Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the epidemiology of middle-ear pathology in primary school entrants is such that any screening procedure based upon a "once and for all' test on a single cohort of children is unlikely to identify those children most in need of intervention and likely to lead to unnecessary over referrals both to a Community Audiology Clinic or a Specialist Unit. Further evidence is produced to show the value of serial tympanometry as a screening tool generally and the use of the tympanometer 85AR specifically. Agreement is also measured between three variables in middle-ear pathology, namely clinical appearance and mobility of the tympanic membrane and the associated Tympanogram Type. The relative merits of clinical examination as a screen are discussed. A population of children from three primary schools was studied on four separate occasions during 1980. 553 five-year-old children were tested overall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher P. Hallett (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: