Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Heterogeneous catalysts are generally assumed to be multiphasic and multicomponent; many of them are, and this is one of the resons why disentangling the factors that govern their mode of action is so difficult. But there is a large class of heterogeneous catalysts where the solid is monophasic and where the activity may be envisaged as being dispersed in a spatially uniform fashion throughout its bulk. This is true both of zeolites and many other microporous catalysts on the one hand, and of certain mixed metal oxides, where the non‐stoiohiometry is inextricably mingled with the catalysis, on the other. By recognizing this broad classification numerous operational advantages follow: the performance of existing catalysts and the design of those yet to be prepared can be placed on a rational footing; moreover, the myriad techniques of solid‐state chemistry and physics, often regarded as inapplicable to the subtle and special problems of surface chemistry, are seen to be of direct relevance as probes for the structure and properties of proven uniform heterogeneous catalysts as well as for the synthesis and development of new ones. This review, which draws analogies with and lessons from the chemistry of enzyme catalysts, focuses largely on the catalytic conversions of hydrocarbons over zeolites, clays, microporous AlPO4 and a wide range of metal oxides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Meurig Thomas (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: