Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Ru II complexes [RuCl(R−PCP)(PPh 3 )] (R−PCP = [C 6 H 3 {CH(Me)PPh 2 } 2 -2,6] - ( 7a ), [C 6 H 3 {CH(Et)PPh 2 } 2 -2,6] - ( 7b ), or [C 6 H 2 {CH 2 PPh 2 } 2 -2,6-SiMe 3 -4] - ( 9 )) were synthesized using distinct synthetic routes. One of these routes consists of the reaction of the parent arene compound R−PCHP (i.e., C 6 H 4 {CH(Me)PPh 2 } 2 -1,3 ( 6a ), C 6 H 4 {CH(Et)PPh 2 } 2 -1,3 ( 6b ), or C 6 H 3 (CH 2 PPh 2 ) 2 -2,6-SiMe 3 -4 ( 8 )) with [RuCl 2 (PPh 3 ) 3 ] in 1,2-dichloroethane. Following this procedure, complexes 7a and 7b were obtained. However, desilylation of 8 was observed with concomitant formation of complex [RuCl(C 6 H 3 {CH 2 PPh 2 } 2 -2,6)(PPh 3 )] ( 4) . A second synthetic approach has been developed and applied in the high-yield synthesis of complexes 7a, 7b, and 9 . This method, a transcyclometalation (TCM) reaction, involves the interconversion of one cyclometalated ligand metal complex, M(C,E), into another complex M(C,E‘) with the concomitant consumption and formation of the corresponding arenes HC,E‘ and HC,E, respectively. Using this method, previously observed problems such as nontolerance to the presence of a SiMe 3 group, contamination of the final product by uncoordinated PPh 3, or the formation of paramagnetic impurities were overcome. Investigations in solution of the formation of these square-pyramidal Ru complexes using two-dimensional NMR techniques ( 1 H− 1 H COSY and 31 P− 1 H COSY) have shown that both synthetic routes were stereoselective, yielding only three of the four expected stereoisomers of complexes 7a and 7b .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dani et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: