Key result
Investigation of MTM1 variants in undiagnosed myopathy patients identified seven novel XLMTM patients, including two girls, suggesting symptomatic female carriers are likely underestimated.
Observational
The study suggests that the number of undiagnosed symptomatic female carriers of MTM1 mutations is likely underestimated.
MTM1 screening may identify sporadic symptomatic female carriers among undiagnosed myopathy patients; leaves open true prevalence pending larger prospective studies.
Mutations in the MTM1 gene cause X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM), characterized by neonatal hypotonia and respiratory failure, and are responsible for a premature mortality in affected males. Female carriers are usually asymptomatic but they may present with muscular weakness because of a hypothesized skewed pattern of X-chromosome inactivation. By combining next generation sequencing (NGS) and CGH array approaches, we have investigated the role of MTM1 variants in a large cohort of undiagnosed patients with a wide spectrum of myopathies. Seven novel XLMTM patients have been identified, including two girls with an unremarkable family history for myotubular myopathy. Moreover, we have detected and finely mapped a large deletion causing a myotubular myopathy with abnormal genital development. Our data confirm that the severe neonatal onset of the disease in male infants is sufficient to address the direct molecular testing toward the MTM1 gene and, above all, suggest that the number of undiagnosed symptomatic female carriers is probably underestimated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savarese et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Undiagnosed myopathies / X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM). MTM1 variants was evaluated on Identification of novel XLMTM patients. Investigation of MTM1 variants in undiagnosed myopathy patients identified seven novel XLMTM patients, including two girls, suggesting symptomatic female carriers are likely underestimated.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: