Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Legal review reveals frequent stroke and nerve injury claims in carotid endarterectomy litigation, suggesting thorough informed consent can mitigate liability.
OBJECTIVES: Characterize factors raised in carotid endarterectomy litigation. METHODS: Outcomes, alleged causes of malpractice, and other factors were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 37 verdicts and settlements, defendants were not liable in 25 (67.5%) cases. Frequently reported complications included stroke (51.3%) and hypoglossal nerve injury (27.0%), with other complications including airway compromise, vocal cord injury, and death. No cases reported myocardial infarction. Cerebral monitoring was mentioned in 2 cases, while inadequate informed consent, delayed diagnosis, and requirement of additional surgery were alleged in numerous instances. Settlements and jury awards averaged US$895 833 and US$1.53 million, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke and hypoglossal nerve injury are the most frequently litigated complications, and mean damages awarded were considerable. Knowledge of issues raised in our analysis may be included in a comprehensive consent process, potentially minimizing liability and improving patient safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Svider et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: