Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ureato-bridged carbonyl cluster [Ru 3 (μ-H)(μ 3 -HNCONMe 2 )(CO) 9 ] ( 1 ) (H 2 NCONMe 2 = N, N -dimethylurea) reacts with 1 equiv of triphenylphosphine or diphenylphosphine to give the isostructural derivatives [Ru 3 (μ-H)(μ 3 -HNCONMe 2 )(L)(CO) 8 ] (L = PPh 3, PPh 2 H). The X-ray structure of [Ru 3 (μ-H)(μ 3 -HNCONMe 2 )(PPh 3 )(CO) 8 ] indicates that the substitution has taken place on an equatorial position cis to the bridging NH fragment. Treatment of 1 with bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) affords a mixture of the symmetric ( C s ) and asymmetric ( C 1 ) isomers of [Ru 3 (μ-H)(μ 3 -HNCONMe 2 )(μ-dppm)(CO) 7 ]. All these reactions take place at room temperature. The phenyl-bridged bis(diphenylphosphido) derivative [Ru 3 (μ-η 1 -Ph)(μ 3 -HNCONMe 2 )(μ-PPh 2 ) 2 (CO) 6 ] has been prepared by reaction of 1 with 2 equiv of PPh 3 in the presence of alumina and has been characterized by X-ray diffraction methods. The thermolysis of [Ru 3 (μ-H)(μ 3 -HNCONMe 2 )(PPh 2 H)(CO) 8 ] in refluxing THF leads to the phosphido-bridged derivatives [Ru 3 (μ 3 -HNCONMe 2 )(μ-PPh 2 )(μ-CO) 2 (CO) 6 ] and [Ru 3 (μ-H)(μ 3 -HNCONMe 2 )(μ-PPh 2 ) 2 (CO) 6 ]. It has been observed that carbonyl substitution reactions on compound 1 are easier than those previously reported on clusters containing N- and/or P -donor bridging ligands. This seems to be related to the hard−soft character of the bridging ligand: the harder the ligand the more reactive is the cluster in carbonyl substitution reactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabeza et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: