Key result
Fetuses with confirmed coarctation of the aorta demonstrated significantly lower left ventricular global longitudinal strain compared to healthy controls (-20.2% vs -23.1%, p=0.01).
Why the study?
To characterize myocardial deformation, ventricular shape, hemodynamics, and fetoplacental circulation in fetuses with suspected coarctation of the aorta compared with controls.
Observational (n=80)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: -20.2% vs -23.1%
p-value: p=0.01
Fetuses with confirmed and false-positive coarctation of the aorta exhibit measurable differences in myocardial deformation and ventricular shape compared to controls, suggesting functional echocardiographic parameters may aid in prenatal evaluation.
Detailed fetal cardiac characterization in suspected COA may aid prenatal assessment; leaves open predictive value for postnatal outcomes.
Detailed characterization of myocardial deformation, ventricular shape, outflow tract size, inflow Doppler patterns, cerebroplacental circulation, and cardiac output of fetuses with suspected coarctation of the aorta (COA) and a control group to gain further insights into differences between these groups. Expectant women were prospectively recruited for assessment during the third trimester of pregnancy and a comparison of echocardiographic characteristics and fetoplacental circulation according to postnatal diagnosis of either confirmed COA (c-COA), false-positive COA (fp-COA), and a control population. There were 42 fetuses recruited with suspected COA of whom 20/42 (48%) had c-COA. Fetuses with c-COA demonstrated lower (less negative) LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) compared to controls (- 20.2% ± 4.3 vs. - 23.1% ± 2.7, p = 0.01) and a non-significant trend to lower strain in the fp-COA group (LV-GLS: - 20.7% ± 5.0, p = 0.053) compared to controls. RV-GLS was significantly reduced in the fp-COA group compared to the c-COA and control groups (fp-COA: - 19.8% ± 4.5, c-COA: - 23.1% ± 4.4, control: - 23.5% ± 3.6, p = 0.04). C-COA and fp-COA had a less spherical (narrower) LV, shorter LV, and a more spherical RV compared to controls. The arterial duct diameter was larger in c-COA compared to fp-COA and controls. When analyzed according to diagnostic group, determinants of GLS and sphericity index differed between groups. For c-COA, there was correlation between LV-GLS and RV-GLS (r = - 0.51, p = 0.021). Determinants of LV-GLS in fp-COA were distal transverse aortic arch z-score and umbilical artery PI (p = 0.026, p = 0.037 respectively). The only determinant of RV-GLS in the FP-COA was arterial duct z-score (r = - 0.51, p = 0.019). There are measurable differences in functional parameters between c-COA, fp-COA, and controls. The hemodynamic characteristics of c-COA and fp-COA merit further study and should include study of the RV and cerebroplacental evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vigneswaran et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Suspected coarctation of the aorta (n=80). Confirmed coarctation of the aorta vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) (p=0.01). Fetuses with confirmed coarctation of the aorta demonstrated significantly lower left ventricular global longitudinal strain compared to healthy controls (-20.2% vs -23.1%, p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: