Key result
Arterial velocity pulse index and arterial pressure volume index demonstrated significant U-shaped associations with the Framingham cardiovascular disease risk score, with the lowest risk observed at 8 units and 18 units, respectively.
Why the study?
Although arterial velocity pulse index and arterial pressure volume index are known to associate with cardiovascular disease risk, the dose-response associations with Framingham cardiovascular disease risk score required examination.
Are arterial velocity pulse index (AVI) and arterial pressure volume index (API) associated with the Framingham cardiovascular disease risk score in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=4,311)
No
Are arterial velocity pulse index (AVI) and arterial pressure volume index (API) associated with the Framingham cardiovascular disease risk score in adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Arterial velocity pulse index and arterial pressure volume index demonstrate a U-shaped association with the Framingham cardiovascular disease risk score, suggesting potential utility in early cardiovascular risk assessment.
Purpose: The new non-invasive arterial stiffness indices, arterial velocity pulse index (AVI) and arterial pressure volume index (API) are known to be associated with cardiovascular disease risk. The present study aimed to examine the "dose-response" associations between AVI, API and Framingham cardiovascular disease risk score (FCVRS). Methods: This survey included individuals with arterial stiffness indices collected at age 18 years and older. We used Pearson's correlation coefficients and multivariate linear analyses to evaluate associations of AVI and API to other variables. The associations between FCVRS and AVI, API were analyzed by restrictive cubic spline. Results: 4311 people were included in the full study population, including 2091 males and 2220 females. In restricted cubic spline regression models, AVI or API had significant U-shaped associations with FCVRS, with the lowest risk score of cardiovascular disease was 8 units or 18 units, respectively. After AVI increased to 12 units, FCVRS increased rapidly until AVI was 27 units, and the FCVRS increased relatively flat afterward. For API, results were similar. When API increased to 23 units, the FCVRS increased rapidly, and after API was 52 units, FCVRS increased relatively flat. Conclusions: AVI or API had U-shaped associations with FCVRS. The associations may provide a new perspective for early treatment or lifestyle modifications to prevent cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=4,311). Arterial velocity pulse index (AVI) and arterial pressure volume index (API) was evaluated on Framingham cardiovascular disease risk score (FCVRS) (p=<0.001). Arterial velocity pulse index and arterial pressure volume index demonstrated significant U-shaped associations with the Framingham cardiovascular disease risk score, with the lowest risk observed at 8 units and 18 units, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: