Key result
Higher CAVI strongly linked to increased CFPWV and lower reactive hyperemia.
Why the study?
Studies assessing the association of Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index with established tests of arterial stiffness and endothelial function are limited.
Does Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) correlate with established tonometric measures of arterial stiffness and vasodilator function in adults with varying cardiovascular risk?
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
Does Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) correlate with established tonometric measures of arterial stiffness and vasodilator function in adults with varying cardiovascular risk?
Effect estimate: r = 0.609
p-value: p=<0.001
CAVI correlates with central arterial stiffness and microvascular vasodilator function, supporting its utility as a non-invasive marker of vascular health.
Supports CAVI evaluation as a vascular marker; leaves open its prognostic role pending prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction are two important features of cardiovascular injury. Arterial stiffness can be measured by Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) and endothelial dysfunction can be assessed with reactive hyperemia measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) is a recently developed method for measuring arterial stiffness. Studies assessing CAVI's association with established tests of arterial stiffness and endothelial function are limited. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of adults (ages 18-80) with a range of cardiovascular disease risk burden, we measured CAVI by VaSera, tonometry measures of arterial stiffness [carotid-radial PWV (CRPWV), carotid-femoral PWV (CFPWV)], and ultrasound based brachial artery measures of vasodilator function. RESULTS: We enrolled 100 participants with acceptable quality from 93 subjects for primary analysis. The mean value of CAVI measure was 7.7 ± 1.2. There was a significant association between CAVI and CFPWV (r = 0.609, P < 0.001), which remained significant after adjusting for systolic blood pressure while the association of CAVI with CRPWV was more modest. Higher Framingham Risk Score, older age, history of hypertension and diabetes were significantly associated with higher CAVI and CFPWV. There was not any association between CAVI and FMD. Higher CAVI was associated with lower reactive hyperemia, an indicator of vasodilator function in the microvasculature (r = -0.365, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that CAVI relates to both central and peripheral artery stiffness though is not identical to tonometry measures. CAVI associates with microvascular but not conduit artery vasodilator function consistent with the interrelation of large artery stiffness with small vessel dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javanmardi et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk burden (n=100). Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) vs. Tonometric measures (CRPWV, CFPWV) and flow-mediated dilation was evaluated on Association between CAVI and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CFPWV) (r = 0.609, p=<0.001). Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) was significantly associated with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (r = 0.609, P < 0.001) and lower reactive hyperemia (r = -0.365, P < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: