Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 1, 2001Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

Mechanical Comparison of Endosteal Substitution and Lateral Plate Fixation in Supracondylar Fractures of the Femur

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MPMichael J. PraysonMMMichael P. Marshall

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Prayson et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a96cbd533d7b00ae7bb9dc4https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200102000-00004
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fatigue Properties of a Twelve-Hole Versus a Five-Hole Intramedullary Supracondylar Nail1997 · 17 citations
  2. 2Double-plating of comminuted, unstable fractures of the distal part of the femur.1991 · 255 citations
  3. 3Treatment of Supracondylar Femoral Fractures With a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail1996 · 86 citations
  4. 4Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Supracondylar Femur Fracture Fixation: Locked Intramedullary Nail Versus 95-Degree Angled Plate1997 · 64 citations
  5. 5The Use of Endosteal Substitution in the Treatment of Recalcitrant Nonunions of the Femur: Report of Seven Cases1996 · 287 citations