Key result
Two-dimensional vena contracta area measurement significantly correlated with three-dimensional measurement (r = 0.97, p < 0.001) and effective regurgitant orifice area (r = 0.89, p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Does two-dimensional vena contracta area measurement accurately assess aortic regurgitation severity compared to three-dimensional measurement and effective regurgitant orifice area in patients with aortic regurgitation?
Cross-Sectional (n=61)
No
Does two-dimensional vena contracta area measurement accurately assess aortic regurgitation severity compared to three-dimensional measurement and effective regurgitant orifice area in patients with aortic regurgitation?
Effect estimate: r = 0.97
p-value: p=<0.001
Two-dimensional vena contracta area measurement is a simple and accurate technique that correlates strongly with 3D measurements and EROA for assessing aortic regurgitation severity.
2D vena contracta area may aid aortic regurgitation grading; extends 3D/EROA correlations but leaves open prospective outcome validation.
BACKGROUND: Quantitation of aortic regurgitation (AR) using two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography, including vena contracta width (VCW) measurement, is still challenging. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography can directly measure the vena contracta area (VCA), regardless of the rheological characteristics. We intended to assess the possibility of 3D vena contracta area (3DVCA) as well as 2D vena contracta area (2DVCA) in the assessment of AR severity. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with AR [17 female (32.7%); mean age: 74.0 ± 10.1 years] underwent 2D and 3D color Doppler echocardiography. Using conventional 2D color Doppler imaging, we measured VCW, 2DVCA, regurgitant volume (RV), and effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA). We also measured 3DVCA manually off-line from 3D full-volume color Doppler datasets for reference. Comprehensive 2D and 3D data on AR severity were successfully obtained from 52 of the 61 (85.2%) patients. RESULTS: Significant correlations existed between 2DVCA and EROA (r = 0.89; p < 0.001). The cut-off 2DVCA for grading severe AR was 34 mm2 (area under curve: 0.95; sensitivity: 78%; specificity: 95%). Significant correlations existed between 3DVCA and EROA (r = 0.89; p < 0.001). The cut-off 3DVCA for grading severe AR was 32 mm2 (area under curve: 0.96; sensitivity: 89%; specificity: 98%). Significant correlations existed between 2DVCA and 3DVCA (r = 0.97; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Two-dimensional, as well as three dimensional, vena contracta area measurement is a simple technique suitable for clinical use during comprehensive Doppler echocardiographic AR assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Aortic regurgitation (n=61). Two-dimensional vena contracta area (2DVCA) measurement vs. Three-dimensional vena contracta area (3DVCA) and effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) was evaluated on Correlation between 2DVCA and 3DVCA (r = 0.97, p=<0.001). Two-dimensional vena contracta area measurement significantly correlated with three-dimensional measurement (r = 0.97, p < 0.001) and effective regurgitant orifice area (r = 0.89, p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: