Key result
Reversing the charge at positions Arg-431 and Glu-462 in the SB triad increased the favorability of channel opening, while preventing movement with short cross-linkers inhibited opening.
The SB triad forms in the closed state of cyclic nucleotide-modulated channels and expands during channel opening, providing a structural mechanism for gating.
Animal data on SB triad gating leave open whether this mechanism informs human channel-targeted therapies.
Activation of cyclic nucleotide-modulated channels such as CNG and HCN channels is promoted by ligand-induced conformational changes in their C-terminal regions. The primary intersubunit interface of these C termini includes two salt bridges per subunit, formed between three residues (one positively charged and two negatively charged amino acids) that we term the SB triad. We previously hypothesized that the SB triad is formed in the closed channel and breaks when the channel opens. Here we tested this hypothesis by dynamically manipulating the SB triad in functioning CNGA1 channels. Reversing the charge at positions Arg-431 and Glu-462, two of the SB triad residues, by either mutation or application of charged reagents increased the favorability of channel opening. To determine how a charge reversal mutation in the SB triad structurally affects the channel, we solved the crystal structure of the HCN2 C-terminal region with the equivalent E462R mutation. The backbone structure of this mutant was very similar to that of wild type, but the SB triad was rearranged such that both salt bridges did not always form simultaneously, suggesting a mechanism for the increased ease of opening of the mutant channels. To prevent movement in the SB triad, we tethered two components of the SB triad region together with cysteine-reactive cross-linkers. Preventing normal movement of the SB triad region with short cross-linkers inhibited channel opening, whereas longer cross-linkers did not. These results support our hypothesis that the SB triad forms in the closed channel and indicate that this region expands as the channel opens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craven et al. (2008) studied this question. Dynamic manipulation of the SB triad (charge reversal mutations and cross-linkers) vs. Wild type channels was evaluated on Channel opening favorability and structural rearrangement. Reversing the charge at positions Arg-431 and Glu-462 in the SB triad increased the favorability of channel opening, while preventing movement with short cross-linkers inhibited opening.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: