Adherence in Evidence-Based Neurotrauma Guidelines: A Worldwide Survey

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury management guidelines vary across regions and there is limited research on real-world adherence to these guidelines. We conducted a global survey to assess the adherence of neurosurgeons to traumatic brain injury guidelines and evidence-based medicine (EBM). METHODS: A 24-item survey was created using Google Forms, covering demographic information, neurotrauma training, basic knowledge of EBM, and surgical and in-hospital management. RESULTS: Responses were collected from 233 neurosurgeons across 53 different countries. Approximately 45% of respondents reported not staying up to date with Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines, and 48% indicated a preference for relying on their own experience over EBM guidelines. Neurosurgeons from Asia and Africa were more likely to rely on personal experience, while those from Europe and North/Central and South America leaned toward EBM (P = 0.021). Additionally, 56% of respondents reported that their neurotrauma management at least sometimes diverged from recommended guidelines. Specifically, 58% never or rarely managed epidural hematoma of 30 cm³ conservatively, and 45% sometimes, often, or always treated subdural hematomas conservatively, even when EBM recommended surgery. Moreover, 24% at least sometimes managed patients conservatively despite a Glasgow Coma Scale score of less than 9 or a decrease of 2 or more points. In cerebellar hematomas, 46% sometimes opted for external ventricular drainage alone. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgeons from Europe and North/Central and South America tend to follow EBM guidelines more closely, while those from Asia and Africa often favor individual decision-making approaches.