Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Letters underscore need for cautious interpretation of surgeon-specific outcomes; leaves open optimal risk-stratified reporting standards in cardiac surgery.
EDITOR—I fully support the use of risk stratified mortality data in preference to crude mortality data if surgeon specific comparisons are to be published. The quality of such information depends on the rigour with which data are collected. …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2003 study reported a letter.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: