The extent to which ingested suspended sediment can be a source of mercury for suspension feeders is largely unknown, yet this information is required to evaluate the biological significance of sediment contamination. We used radiotracer methodology to experimentally compare the bioavailability of dissolved and sediment-bound mercury for a marine bivalve. We examined the relative importance of specific sedimentary components that may exert control on the uptake of Hg(II) and CH 3 Hg(II) from sediments in the mussel Mytilus edulis, which is widely used in national monitoring programs as a bioindicator organism for detect ing coastal contamination. Iron and manganese oxides, montmorillonite clay, and silica, with and without organic coatings, as well as natural sediment particles were radiolabeled with either 203 Hg(II) or CH 3 203 Hg using nanomolar levels of Hg. Fulvic acid coatings enhanced the sorption of both Hg(II) and CH 3 Hg(II) onto every type of particle, and partition coefficients were as high as 10 5 . The assimilation efficiencies (AE) in mussels were very low for Hg(II) (1−9%) but were typically >30% for CH 3 Hg(II) and as high as 87%. The organic coatings increased AE for CH 3 Hg(II) bound to all types of particles, but had no impact on Hg(II). Unlike Cd, Co, and Ag, there was little (<10%) desorption of 203 Hg from particles at pH 5 (to simulate the behavior of food-bound metals in the acidic gut of bivalves), and it did not influence Hg assimilation in mussels. The absorption of CH 3 Hg(II) by mussels is rapid and efficient even from uncoated inorganic particles that were rapidly egested out of the animal's gut due to their low nutritional value. The concentration factor (10 3 ) of dissolved Hg(II) in mus sels was half that of dissolved CH 3 Hg(II). These results suggest that contaminated sediments can be a significant source of Hg, especially organic mercury, to marine suspension feeders and that CH 3 Hg(II) is assimilable from all major sedimentary components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gagnon et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: