The Impact of Suprarenal Diameter on Outcomes Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives To determine the association between suprarenal aortic diameters and complications that may be attributed to a dilating phenotype following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Design This study is a retrospective review. Methods We measured the abdominal aortas of 147 consecutive patients with a mean age of 78.5 (range 60-93) years, who had a mean Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) follow-up of 3 years (6 months to 8 years) at a public Hospital. Aortic calibres measured 5 mm above the highest renal artery were recorded, patients were categorised according to suprarenal diameter; Group A: greater than 25 mm, Group B: less than or equal to 25 mm. Stent migration, aneurysmal sac growth, presence of an endoleak and its type, occlusion events, rupture, interventions and mortality, as well as clinical history and demographic data were compared between groups. Results There was a significantly higher occurrence of stent migration (11% v 0%; P = .01) in patients with larger suprarenal aortas (Group A). The occurrence of any endoleak did not differ between the groups, however, significantly more complications resulting in secondary intervention, excluding occlusions, were noted in Group A (34% vs 17%, P = .04). Conclusions The results from this study suggest that patients with above-average suprarenal diameters (categorised as dilators) may have a higher occurrence of specific complications following EVAR. A more detailed study to establish the association of suprarenal calibre with types of complications following EVAR is warranted.