Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To compare the effect of phacoemulsification on corneal epithelial thickness in diabetic and nondiabetic cataract patients. Methods: Fifty eyes with cataracts were enrolled in a prospective comparative interventional study. They were divided into two groups: group A (diabetics) and group B (nondiabetics) and underwent uneventful phacoemulsification. Epithelial thickness was assessed in the central, paracentral, and peripheral cornea on the first day and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively using spectral-domain ocular coherence tomography. Results: A significant increase in the first-day postoperative central epithelial thickness was noticed in both groups (57.16± 3.5 μm and 55.96± 2.81 μm in groups A and B, respectively), with increased baseline epithelial thickness of 3.8± 2.1 μm and 3.4± 2.14 μm in groups A and B, respectively ( P < 0.001). A significant decrease in epithelial thickness was noticed in both groups after 1 week (− 2.40± 3.1 μm and − 2.76± 2.71 μm in group A and B, respectively). No further significant change was noticed in the nondiabetic group at 1 month; however, significant reductions in for central epithelial thickness were found in the diabetic group up to the first month (− 0.80± 1.9 μm, P =0.05). Central corneal thickness followed the same pattern of change as the epithelium. A nonsignificant delay in visual acuity improvement was noticed in diabetic patients. Conclusion: Phacoemulsification induces a temporary increase in corneal and epithelial thickness that should resolve by the first week postoperatively. However, diabetic patients had slower epithelial recovery that took up to 1 month, which could be reflected in delayed visual recovery with no effect on the final visual outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elmekawey et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: