We initiated a study of the effects of mycorrhizal fungal community composition on the restoration of tropical dry seasonal forest trees. Tree seedlings were planted in a severely burned experimental site (1995 fire) during the growing season of 1998 at the El Edén Ecological Reserve, in north Quintana Roo, Mexico. Seedlings ofLeucaena leucocephala,Guazuma ulmifolia,Caesalpinia violacea,Piscidia piscipula,Gliricidia sepium, andCochlospermum vitifoliumwere germinated in steam‐sterilized soil and either remained uninoculated (nonmycorrhizal at transplanting) or were inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi in soils from early‐seral (recently burned) or late‐seral (mature forest) inoculum. Inoculum from the early‐seral soil was largelyGlomusspp., whereas a diverse community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were reintroduced from the mature forest including species ofScutellospora,Gigaspora,Glomus, Sclerocystis, andAcaulospora. Plants grew better when associated with the mature forest inoculum, unlike a previous experiment in which plants grew taller with the early‐seral inoculum. Reasons for the different responses include a less‐intense burn resulting in more residual organic matter. In addition to mycorrhizal responses, plants were severely affected by deer browsing. One tree species,C. vitifoliumfound in the region but not in the reserve, was eliminated by a resident fungal facultative pathogen. Several practical conclusions for restoration can be made. The common nursery practice of soil sterilization may be detrimental because it eliminates beneficial mycorrhizal fungi; species not native to the site may not survive because they may not be adapted to the local pathogens; and herbivory can be severe depending on the landscape context of the restoration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allen et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: