Key result
Psychophysical exams, including contrast sensitivity, microperimetry, and chromatic sensitivity tests, are useful, safe, reproducible, and inexpensive tools for the early diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Why the study?
Do psychophysical exams improve early detection of diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes?
Do psychophysical exams improve early detection of diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes?
Psychophysical exams like contrast sensitivity and microperimetry can detect early visual dysfunction in diabetic patients before structural retinal changes are visible.
Retinopathy is a serious and common complication of diabetes that represents the leading cause of blindness, among people of working age, in developed countries. It is estimated that the number of people with diabetic retinopathy (DR) will increase from 126.6 million in 2011 to 191 million by 2030. The visual function that seems to be affected first in the course of DR is probably the contrast sensitivity; in addition, being mainly a macular function, the perception of colour is also compromised. Moreover, the duration of the disease, the levels of glycated haemoglobin (HbA 1c ) and the presence of cystoid macular oedema are strongly associated with the impairment of fixation stability in patients with diabetes with clinically significant macular oedema, suggesting the possible diagnostic role of microperimetry. The test of contrast sensitivity and the microperimetry and the chromatic sensitivity tests have proved to be useful, safe, reproducible and inexpensive tools to diagnose the disease early.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pescosolido et al. (2010) conducted a review in Diabetic Retinopathy. Psychophysical exams (contrast sensitivity, microperimetry, chromatic sensitivity) was evaluated. Psychophysical exams, including contrast sensitivity, microperimetry, and chromatic sensitivity tests, are useful, safe, reproducible, and inexpensive tools for the early diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: