Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) has been previously reported as a technique for non invasive assessment of tissue change. Our previous in vivo studies demonstrated the ability of EIS to non-invasively detect and longitudinally follow tumor growth. This study was designed to determine the ability of EIS to detect tumors at a very early stage post-implantation. Complex impedance measurements were collected from eight rats with one control and one tumor implanted leg six or seven days after tumor cell inoculation. Legs were also imaged with computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) in an effort to determine EIS resolution and sensitivity. Six of the animals were sacrificed immediately after imaging, and tissue was collected for histology and later co-registration of the pathology with the imaging techniques. Results show that EIS is able to repeatedly detect small tumors (<3 mm) and tumor-associated changes, whereas CT and US were not routinely capable of detecting pathological developments on this scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skourou et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: