Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The case is presented of a young and violent chronic schizophrenic patient whose symptoms respond to antipsychotic medication but who was recorded, at a time when he was deemed competent, as expressing a wish that he should not be given antipsychotic treatment. Under the present usage of the Ontario Mental Health Act, substitute consent givers are bound by such a "prior competent wish" and this patient must now be considered one of a growing group of "legally untreatable" psychotic patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: