Key result
Myocardial blood flow during dobutamine infusion was significantly higher in contractile reserve-positive segments compared to negative segments (1.28 vs 0.63 mL/g/min; P<.0001).
Why the study?
Does contractile reserve depend on myocardial blood flow at rest and during inotropic stimulation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction due to chronic coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=19)
Does contractile reserve depend on myocardial blood flow at rest and during inotropic stimulation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction due to chronic coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.28% vs 0.63%
p-value: p=<.0001
In patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction, contractile reserve during dobutamine stimulation is dependent on the ability to increase myocardial blood flow.
May link contractile reserve to perfusion augmentation in ischemic LV dysfunction; hypothesis-generating, should not yet change viability testing.
BACKGROUND: Contractile reserve, improvement in contractile function during inotropic stimulation, is a proposed marker of viable myocardium. This study was designed to address, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction due to chronic coronary artery disease, whether contractile reserve depends on myocardial blood flow. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 19 patients, at rest and during dobutamine, with 2D echocardiography for regional mechanical function and PET for regional myocardial blood flow ([(15)O]water) and oxygen consumption ([11C]acetate). Of 166 myocardial segments, 21 had normal systolic function, 56 were dysfunctional but contractile reserve-positive, and 89 were dysfunctional and contractile reserve-negative. Myocardial blood flow at rest was lower in contractile reserve-negative (0.41+/-0.18 mL x g(-1) x min(-1)) than in contractile reserve-positive (0.50+/-0.22 mL x g(-1) x min(-1)) and normal segments (0.55+/-0.20 mL x g(-1) x min(-1), P<.009). After dobutamine infusion, blood flow increased less in contractile reserve-negative (0.63+/-0.38 mL x g(-1) x min(-1)) than in contractile reserve-positive (1.28+/-0.65 mL x g(-1) x min(-1)) and normal segments (1.93+/-0.83 mL x g(-1) x min(-1), P<.0001). Likewise, myocardial oxygen consumption was lower at rest in contractile reserve-negative (clearance rate of [11C]acetate, 0.043+/-0.012 min(-1)) than in contractile reserve-positive (0.048+/-0.01 min(-1)) and normal segments (0.058+/-0.008 min(-1), P<.02). Myocardial oxygen consumption with dobutamine increased less in contractile reserve-negative (0.060+/-0.013 min(-1)) than in contractile reserve-positive (0.077+/-0.016 min(-1)) and normal segments (0.092+/-0.024 min(-1), P<.0001). Of segments defined as viable by PET, 54% were contractile reserve-negative and exhibited lower blood flow with dobutamine (0.72+/-0.36 mL x g(-1) x min(-1)) than with viable, contractile reserve-positive segments (1.29+/-0.70 mL x g(-1) x min(-1), P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Contractile reserve depends, in part, on the level of myocardial blood flow at rest and during inotropic stimulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (1997) conducted an observational in left ventricular dysfunction due to chronic coronary artery disease (n=19). Contractile reserve-positive segments vs. Contractile reserve-negative segments was evaluated on Myocardial blood flow after dobutamine infusion (p=<.0001). Myocardial blood flow during dobutamine infusion was significantly higher in contractile reserve-positive segments compared to negative segments (1.28 vs 0.63 mL/g/min; P<.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: