Key result
Rapid weaning from external ventricular drainage resulted in similar rates of shunt implantation compared to gradual weaning (63.4% vs 62.5%) but significantly reduced ICU and hospital stays.
Why the study?
Does rapid weaning from external ventricular drainage reduce ICU and hospital length of stay without increasing the need for shunt placement compared to gradual weaning in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
RCT (n=81)
Single-blind
Randomized to rapid or gradual weaning
No
Does rapid weaning from external ventricular drainage reduce ICU and hospital length of stay without increasing the need for shunt placement compared to gradual weaning in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Absolute Event Rate: 63.4% vs 62.5%
p-value: p=NS
Rapid weaning from external ventricular drainage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is as safe as gradual weaning regarding the need for permanent shunting, while significantly reducing ICU and hospital length of stay.
Supports rapid EVD weaning in aSAH to shorten ICU/hospital stays without increasing shunts; provides first RCT confirmation of safety.
OBJECT: The goal of this study was to compare rapid and gradual weaning from external ventricular drainage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in a prospective, randomized trial. METHODS: Between December 2001 and December 2002, 81 patients with aneurysmal SAH in whom external ventricular drains (EVDs) had been placed were enrolled in the study: 41 patients were randomized to the rapidly weaned group and 40 were randomized to the gradually weaned group. The two groups were well matched with respect to age, sex, posterior aneurysm location, Fisher grade, Hunt and Hess grade, intraventricular hemorrhage on admission, and hydrocephalus on admission. Rapid weaning was defined as weaning that occurred within 24 hours with immediate closure of the EVD, whereas gradual weaning took place over a 96-hour period with daily, sequential height elevations of the EVD system followed by drain closure for 24 hours. All patients in whom EVD weaning failed underwent shunt placement. Rates of shunt implantation, days in the intensive care unit (ICU), and overall duration of hospitalization were compared. There was no significant difference in rates of shunt implantation between the rapidly weaned (63.4%) and gradually weaned (62.5%) groups. Nevertheless, patients in the gradually weaned group spent a mean of 2.8 more days in the ICU (p = 0.0002) and 2.4 more days in the hospital (p = 0.0314) than patients in the rapidly weaned group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with rapid weaning, gradual, multistep EVD weaning provided no advantage to patients with aneurysmal SAH in preventing the need for long-term shunt placement and prolonged ICU and hospital stays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klopfenstein et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with acute hydrocephalus (n=81). Rapid weaning from external ventricular drainage vs. Gradual weaning (over 96 hours with daily sequential height elevations) was evaluated on Rate of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement (p=NS). Rapid weaning from external ventricular drainage resulted in similar rates of shunt implantation compared to gradual weaning (63.4% vs 62.5%) but significantly reduced ICU and hospital stays.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: