Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Local perforator flaps represent a new era for resurfacing soft-tissue defects of the hand. They provide durable coverage using flaps harvested from the closed vicinity of the defect. Digital artery perforator flaps [DAPF] have been recently used for finger reconstruction.Purpose: This meta-analysis study with clinical cases was conducted to reveal the surgical and cosmetic outcomes of DAPF for reconstructing soft-tissue defects of the digits.Methods: A systematic literature review was executed up to 1 April 2022. All clinical studies that included patients with finger defects and receiving DAPF for resurfacing finger defects were included. The flap survival rate and the rate of DAPF-related complications were evaluated.Results: The present study included eleven articles comprehending 403 patients with 440 reconstructed finger defects. The rate of flap survival was 93.1% [95CI% 89.7%, 95.5%, p<0.001] while the rate of flap congestion was 17.3% [95CI% 6.8%, 37.6%, p=0.004]. Furthermore, the rate of flap necrosis was 8.9% [95CI% 5.7%, 13.7%, P<0.001] and the rate of superficial epidermolysis was 4.7% [95CI% 0.2%, 10.8%, P<0.001].Conclusion: The DAPF is a reliable procedure for reconstructing soft-tissue defects in the fingers. It provides stable coverage with satisfactory functional and surgical outcomes. It is a convenient addition to the armamentarium for covering soft-tissue defects of the digits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elkhwas et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: