Key result
Volitional yoga breathing significantly decreased peak latencies of auditory middle latency responses compared to nonvolitional breathing controls, which increased or did not change latencies.
Why the study?
Previous research suggested volitional yoga breathing facilitates auditory information processing while nonvolitional breathing has opposite effects, prompting investigation of auditory middle latency responses across these practices.
Do volitional yoga breathing practices improve auditory middle latency responses in healthy participants compared to nonvolitional breathing controls?
RCT (n=50)
random order
Do volitional yoga breathing practices improve auditory middle latency responses in healthy participants compared to nonvolitional breathing controls?
Volitional yoga breathing enhances auditory sensory transmission at the thalamic and primary auditory cortex levels compared to nonvolitional breathing.
Volitional yoga breathing enhances auditory sensory transmission; extends RCT evidence for breathing practices on central neural function.
Background: Previous research has suggested that volitional yoga breathing (VYB) facilitates auditory information processing, whereas control nonvolitional breathing has opposite effects. Objective: This study investigated auditory middle latency responses (AMLR) in (i) three VYB which vary breath rate differently (i.e., bellows yoga breathing, high-frequency yoga breathing, and bumblebee yoga breathing), and (ii) two control conditions (i.e., breath awareness and quiet rest). Methods: Fifty healthy participants aged between 18 and 35 years (M:F, 1:1) participated in this study, with assessment in five random order sessions (each 28 min) over 5 consecutive days. AMLR and respiration were assessed before, during, and after each session. Results: During the three VYB sessions, there were significant decreases in peak latencies (repeated-measures analysis of variance and preduring post hoc tests). In contrast, during breath awareness, the peak latencies of the Pa and Nb waves increased with no change in latencies during quiet rest. Discussion: The changes in peak latencies suggest VYB facilitated auditory transmission at thalamic and primary auditory cortex levels (based on the neural generators of AMLR components). In contrast, breath awareness was associated with prolonged transmission at primary auditory cortex levels (from Pa and Nb latency changes). Peak amplitude changes suggest neuronal recruitment increased during VYB but not during controls. Hence, irrespective of changes in breathing, VYB enhances sensory transmission, whereas nonvolitional breathing may inhibit it. Conclusion: These changes may contribute to the beneficial effects of VYB in cognition and perception, with possible applications in various activities and occupations requiring optimal auditory sensory functioning. Limitations include a focus on experienced practitioners and the examination of short-term effects alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chetry et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=50). Volitional yoga breathing (VYB) practices (bellows, high-frequency, and bumblebee) vs. Nonvolitional breathing controls (breath awareness and quiet rest) was evaluated on Auditory middle latency responses (AMLR) peak latencies. Volitional yoga breathing significantly decreased peak latencies of auditory middle latency responses compared to nonvolitional breathing controls, which increased or did not change latencies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: