Key result
Yogic breathing shows no difference from slow paced breathing on cardiovascular control pathways.
Why the study?
There are sparse data on the specific effects of slow yogic breathing compared with other slow breathing patterns on cardiovascular control pathways.
Does slow yogic breathing differentially impact cardiovascular control pathways compared to slow paced breathing in long-term yoga practitioners?
Cross-Sectional (n=7)
Does slow yogic breathing differentially impact cardiovascular control pathways compared to slow paced breathing in long-term yoga practitioners?
In experienced yoga practitioners, breathing frequency rather than the specific yogic breathing technique is the key factor in respiratory-mediated cardiovascular fluctuations.
Frequency may outweigh technique in respiratory cardiovascular effects among experienced practitioners; hypothesis-generating and requires broader validation.
One in twelve U.S. adults practice yoga annually. Some data suggest improvement in cardiovascular health with yoga training. Though a shift in cardiovascular control has been purported with slow yogic breathing, there are sparse data on its specific effects compared with other slow breathing patterns. We investigated whether slow yogic breathing differentially impacts the interrelations among respiration, heart rate, and blood pressure in seven long‐term yoga practitioners (>;10 yrs). To determine whether control pathways are distinctly different across breathing patterns, a Granger causality test was used to define the pathway(s) linking respiration, heart rate and blood pressure during 0.25 Hz, 0.1 Hz, and yogic breathing. Yogic breathing ranged from 0.03–0.10Hz and encompassed respiratory maneuvers including breath‐holds, segmented breathing, and ujjayi. The strongest cardiovascular control path was from respiration to heart rate to blood pressure and this was significantly stronger during 0.25 Hz breathing. However, yogic and slow paced breathing did not differentially impact this cardiovascular control path. Thus, it appears in experienced yogic breathers, breathing frequency is a key factor in respiratory‐mediated cardiovascular fluctuations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamner et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Long-term yoga practitioners (n=7). Yogic breathing vs. 0.25 Hz and 0.1 Hz slow paced breathing was evaluated on Cardiovascular control path from respiration to heart rate to blood pressure. Yogic and slow paced breathing did not differentially impact the cardiovascular control path from respiration to heart rate to blood pressure in experienced yoga practitioners.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: