Key result
Laplacian estimates based on the finite dimensions model were not significantly different from the negligible dimensions model when evaluated on human electrocardiogram data (p >> 0.05).
Why the study?
Prior concentric ring electrode optimization was based exclusively on negligible dimensions models, whereas a newer finite dimensions model enables more comprehensive design optimization.
A new finite dimensions model for concentric ring electrodes provides comparable surface Laplacian estimates to the traditional negligible dimensions model, allowing for more comprehensive design optimization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers greater flexibility in concentric ring electrode design; leaves open its impact on routine clinical electrocardiography.
While progress has been made in design optimization of concentric ring electrodes maximizing the accuracy of the surface Laplacian estimation, it was based exclusively on the negligible dimensions model of the electrode. Recent proof of concept of the new finite dimensions model that adds the radius of the central disc and the widths of concentric rings to the previously included number of rings and inter-ring distances provides an opportunity for more comprehensive design optimization. In this study, the aforementioned proof of concept was developed into a framework allowing direct comparison of any two concentric ring electrodes of the same size and with the same number of rings. The proposed framework is illustrated on constant and linearly increasing inter-ring distances tripolar concentric ring electrode configurations and validated on electrocardiograms from 20 human volunteers. In particular, ratios of truncation term coefficients between the two electrode configurations were used to demonstrate the similarity between the negligible and the finite dimension models analytically (p = 0.077). Laplacian estimates based on the two models were calculated on electrocardiogram data for emulation of linearly increasing inter-ring distances tripolar concentric ring electrode. The difference between the estimates was not statistically significant (p >> 0.05) which is consistent with the analytic result.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makeyev et al. (2019) studied Healthy volunteers (electrocardiogram data) (n=20). Finite dimensions model of concentric ring electrodes vs. Negligible dimensions model was evaluated on Difference in Laplacian estimates between the finite and negligible dimension models (p=>> 0.05). Laplacian estimates based on the finite dimensions model were not significantly different from the negligible dimensions model when evaluated on human electrocardiogram data (p >> 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: