Key result
Flexible concentric ring electrodes presented lower skin-electrode contact impedance, lower baseline wander, and less sensitivity to interference and motion artefacts than rigid electrodes.
Why the study?
Do flexible concentric ring electrodes improve ECG signal quality compared to rigid concentric ring electrodes in healthy volunteers?
Do flexible concentric ring electrodes improve ECG signal quality compared to rigid concentric ring electrodes in healthy volunteers?
Flexible concentric ring electrodes provide better signal quality and lower impedance than rigid electrodes for non-invasive bioelectrical recordings.
May support wearable ECG monitoring; leaves open validation in clinical populations.
Bioelectrical surface recordings are usually performed by unipolar or bipolar disc electrodes even though they entail the serious disadvantage of having poor spatial resolution. Concentric ring electrodes give improved spatial resolution, although this type of electrode has so far only been implemented in rigid substrates and as they are not adapted to the curvature of the recording surface may provide discomfort to the patient. Moreover, the signals recorded by these electrodes are usually lower in amplitude than conventional disc electrodes. The aim of this work was thus to develop and test a new modular active sensor made up of concentric ring electrodes printed on a flexible substrate by thick-film technology together with a reusable battery-powered signal-conditioning circuit. Simultaneous ECG recording with both flexible and rigid concentric ring electrodes was carried out on ten healthy volunteers at rest and in motion. The results show that flexible concentric ring electrodes not only present lower skin–electrode contact impedance and lower baseline wander than rigid electrodes but are also less sensitive to interference and motion artefacts. We believe these electrodes, which allow bioelectric signals to be acquired non-invasively with better spatial resolution than conventional disc electrodes, to be a step forward in the development of new monitoring systems based on Laplacian potential recordings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prats-Boluda et al. (2012) studied Healthy (n=10). Flexible concentric ring electrodes vs. Rigid concentric ring electrodes was evaluated on Skin-electrode contact impedance, baseline wander, and sensitivity to interference and motion artefacts. Flexible concentric ring electrodes presented lower skin-electrode contact impedance, lower baseline wander, and less sensitivity to interference and motion artefacts than rigid electrodes.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: