A randomized controlled trial involving 13 institutions in Japan was conducted in order to compare the efficacy of tegafur plus mitomycin C (MMC) (Regimen A) and UFT (a combination of uracil and tegafur at a molar ratio of 4 to 1) plus MMC (Regimen B) for patients with advanced gastric cancer, who had not received any prior cancer chemotherapy. Regimen A (tegafur + MMC) consisted of 5 mg of MMC/m2/week given intravenously, and 500 mg of tegafur/m2/day given orally. Regimen B consisted of the same schedule of MMC and 375 mg of UFT/m2/day given orally. One hundred and eighty-six patients with primary gastric cancer were entered; 183 were eligible and 3 were ineligible for the study. A total of 169 were evaluable for efficacy of the treatment, including 90 patients with Regimen A and 79 with Regimen B. A response rate of 7.8% (7/90 cases) for Regimen A and one of 25.3% (20/79 cases) for Regimen B were obtained, indicating a significantly higher response rate for Regimen B according to the Criteria for Evaluating Efficacy of Chemotherapy/Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer (P = 0.004). Regarding side effects, no marked differences in either severity or incidence were observed between the two groups. The group assigned to Regimen B showed a significant survival advantage after adjustment for major prognostic factors using a proportional hazards model (P = 0.0398). Moreover, a close correlation of antitumor effect and survival duration was found when the above criteria were used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurihara et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: