Key result
Complete traumatic spinal cord injury (AIS A) was associated with significantly lower sympathetic vasomotor regulation compared to incomplete injuries (AIS B, C, D), whereas standard clinical assessments showed no differences in supine hemodynamics.
Why the study?
Assessment of impaired autonomic nervous system function is not part of routine clinical practice during inpatient rehabilitation following traumatic SCI.
Cross-Sectional (n=41)
Standardized Mean Difference: 1.44
Absolute Event Rate: 0.66% vs 1.65%
p-value: p=<0.001
Current clinical standards (ISNCSCI and ISAFSCI) may lack sensitivity in detecting cardiovascular autonomic nervous system impairment during inpatient rehabilitation following traumatic spinal cord injury.
Standard assessments may miss autonomic impairment in complete SCI; hypothesis-generating for prospective validation of vasomotor testing.
Assessment of the degree of impaired autonomic nervous system (ANS) function is not part of routine clinical practice during inpatient rehabilitation following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). The goal of this investigation was to determine the utility of the International Standards for Neurologic Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI) and the recently revised International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after SCI (ISAFSCI) in documenting cardiovascular ANS impairment during inpatient rehabilitation following traumatic SCI. Beat-to-beat recording of supine heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were collected at the bedside for estimation of total cardiovascular ISAFSCI score, cardio-vagal modulation (i.e., high frequency HR variability [HF HRV ]) and sympathetic vasomotor regulation (i.e., Mayer wave component of systolic BP [SBP mayer ]). A total of 41 participants completed baseline testing, which was conducted 11 ± 5 days from the admission ISNCSCI examination. There were no differences in supine HR or BP based on the ISNCSCI or ISAFSCI assessments. The HF HRV was generally lower with more distal lesions (r 2 = 0.15; p = 0.01), and SBP mayer was significantly lower in those with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A compared with AIS B, C, D (Cohen's d = -1.4; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in HF HRV or SBP mayer in patients with or without ISAFSCI evidence of cardiovascular ANS impairment. These preliminary data suggest that neither the ISNCSCI nor the ISAFSCI are sensitive to changes in ANS cardiovascular function following traumatic SCI. Bedside assessment of HR and BP variabilities may provide insight, but are not readily available in the clinical setting. Further research is required to evaluate methods that accurately assess the degree of ANS impairment following traumatic SCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wecht et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (n=41). Complete motor and sensory injury (AIS A classification) vs. Incomplete injury (AIS B, C, D classification) was evaluated on Mayer wave component of systolic blood pressure (SBP mayer) (Cohen's d = 1.44, p=<0.001). Complete traumatic spinal cord injury (AIS A) was associated with significantly lower sympathetic vasomotor regulation compared to incomplete injuries (AIS B, C, D), whereas standard clinical assessments showed no differences in supine hemodynamics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: