Key result
Group-based metacognitive therapy will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial to determine its effectiveness in reducing anxiety and depression among 332 cardiac rehabilitation patients.
Why the study?
Does group-based metacognitive therapy added to usual cardiac rehabilitation reduce the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms in cardiac rehabilitation patients?
Population
Cardiac rehabilitation patients with elevated anxiety and/or depressive symptoms referred to cardiac…
Comparison
Group-based metacognitive therapy consisting of… vs Usual cardiac rehabilitation alone.
Design
Other, 1:1 ratio via a minimisation algorithm to maximise balance between the…
Follow-up
4 and 12 months
Authors
Loading...
This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of group-based metacognitive therapy for treating anxiety and depression in cardiac rehabilitation patients.
RCT (n=332)
Single-blind
1:1 ratio via a minimisation algorithm
Yes
Does group-based metacognitive therapy added to usual cardiac rehabilitation reduce the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms in cardiac rehabilitation patients?
This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of group-based metacognitive therapy for treating anxiety and depression in cardiac rehabilitation patients.
Wells et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Anxiety and depression in cardiac rehabilitation patients (n=332). Group-based metacognitive therapy (Group-MCT) plus usual cardiac rehabilitation vs. Usual cardiac rehabilitation alone was evaluated on Severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms at 4-month follow-up measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) total score. Group-based metacognitive therapy will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial to determine its effectiveness in reducing anxiety and depression among 332 cardiac rehabilitation patients.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: