Key result
Combination therapy with nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi resulted in the same motor function trajectory as monotherapy in SMA type I patients.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether combination therapy with nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi is more effective than monotherapy alone in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type I.
Does combination therapy with nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi improve motor function trajectories compared to monotherapy in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type I?
Cohort
Does combination therapy with nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi improve motor function trajectories compared to monotherapy in patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type I?
Combination therapy with nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi does not appear to improve motor function trajectories compared to monotherapy in SMA type I, emphasizing the importance of early treatment.
No added motor benefit from combination therapy in this SMA type I cohort; leaves open optimal regimens pending randomized trials.
Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular progressive disease, characterized by decreased amounts of survival motor neuron (SMN) protein, due to an autosomal recessive genetic defect. Despite recent research, there is still no cure. Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide acting on the SMN2 gene, is intrathecally administered all life long, while onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi, a gene therapy, is administered intravenously only once. Both therapies have proven efficacy, with best outcomes obtained when administered presymptomatically. In recent years, disease-modifying therapies such as nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi have changed the natural history of SMA. Methods: We observed seven SMA type I patients, who received both therapies. We compared their motor function trajectories, ventilation hours and cough assist sessions to a control group of patients who received one therapy, in order to investigate whether combination therapy may be more effective than a single intervention alone. Results: Patients who received both therapies, compared to the monotherapy cohort, had the same motor function trajectory. Moreover, it was observed that the evolution of motor function was better in the 6 months following the first therapy than in the first 6 months after adding the second treatment. Conclusions: Our results suggest that early treatment is more important than combined therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mirea et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type I. Combination therapy with nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi vs. Monotherapy (one therapy alone) was evaluated on Motor function trajectories, ventilation hours and cough assist sessions. Combination therapy with nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi resulted in the same motor function trajectory as monotherapy in SMA type I patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: