Key result
High-capacity adenoviral vectors efficiently delivered the CRISPR/Cas9 machinery to introduce targeted DNA double-strand breaks in immortalized and primary cells, achieving up to 93.3% gene editing activity.
A novel high-capacity adenoviral vector platform enables efficient, single-vector delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 machinery for multiplexed gene editing in immortalized and primary cells.
Efficient adenoviral CRISPR delivery in primary cells; leaves open in vivo cardiovascular translation and safety.
The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 system revolutionized the field of gene editing but viral delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system has not been fully explored. Here we adapted clinically relevant high-capacity adenoviral vectors (HCAdV) devoid of all viral genes for the delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 machinery using a single viral vector. We present a platform enabling fast transfer of the Cas9 gene and gRNA expression units into the HCAdV genome including the option to choose between constitutive or inducible Cas9 expression and gRNA multiplexing. Efficacy and versatility of this pipeline was exemplified by producing different CRISPR/Cas9-HCAdV targeting the human papillomavirus (HPV) 18 oncogene E6, the dystrophin gene causing Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and the HIV co-receptor C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5). All CRISPR/Cas9-HCAdV proved to be efficient to deliver the respective CRISPR/Cas9 expression units and to introduce the desired DNA double strand breaks at their intended target sites in immortalized and primary cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ehrke‐Schulz et al. (2017) studied Gene editing. CRISPR/Cas9 delivery via high-capacity adenoviral vectors (HCAdV) was evaluated on Gene editing efficiency (DNA double-strand break induction). High-capacity adenoviral vectors efficiently delivered the CRISPR/Cas9 machinery to introduce targeted DNA double-strand breaks in immortalized and primary cells, achieving up to 93.3% gene editing activity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: