Key result
Implementing a perioperative management protocol increased bridging therapy with full doses of enoxaparin before surgery (50% vs 18.5%, p=0.04) and reduced aspirin discontinuation (55.3% vs 76%, p=0.03).
Why the study?
Does the implementation of an ACCP-based protocol improve perioperative antithrombotic management in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery?
Observational (n=214)
Does the implementation of an ACCP-based protocol improve perioperative antithrombotic management in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery?
Implementation of an ACCP-based perioperative protocol for hip fracture surgery improved adherence to bridging and aspirin continuation recommendations without increasing bleeding or thrombotic events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support protocol use to boost adherence in hip fracture surgery; leaves open outcome benefits pending RCTs.
This study aimed to describe the impact of implementing a protocol on the perioperative management of patients admitted for hip fracture treated with antithrombotics. A protocol was designed based on the recommendations from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP). After its implementation (May 2012), information on antithrombotic management was collected from admission to 3 months after surgery in retrospective (October 2011-March 2012) and prospective (October 2012-March 2013) cohorts. Patients' thromboembolic risk was classified into high, moderate or low according to the ACCP categories. A total of 113 and 101 cases were included in the retrospective and prospective cohorts, respectively. No differences in age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiology score or thrombotic risk categories were observed between cohorts. Most patients were treated with aspirin or triflusal (55.1% and 48.1% in each cohort, respectively), clopidogrel (24.5% and 26.6%) or acenocoumarol (16.3% and 20.2%). In moderate to high thromboembolic risk patients, a higher rate of bridging therapy with full doses of enoxaparin (18.5% and 50%, p = 0.04 before and 9.1% and 43.7%, p = 0.02 after surgery) and a lower rate of aspirin discontinuation (76% and 55.3%, p = 0.03) were observed in the prospective cohort. Both cohorts had a similar percentage of cases with bleeding (68.1% and 68.3%) and thrombotic events (11.5% and 13%). No differences in the timing between surgery and the discontinuation or resumption of antithrombotics were noted. After the protocol implementation, aspirin was less often stopped and bridging therapy with therapeutic doses of enoxaparin was used more often. However, interruption and resumption times of antithrombotics remained almost unchanged. In order to achieve these goals, more efforts should be made to implement the protocol in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iavecchia et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Hip fracture in patients treated with antithrombotics (n=214). Perioperative management protocol based on ACCP recommendations vs. Retrospective cohort (usual care before protocol implementation) was evaluated on Bridging therapy with full doses of enoxaparin before surgery in moderate to high thromboembolic risk patients (p=0.04). Implementing a perioperative management protocol increased bridging therapy with full doses of enoxaparin before surgery (50% vs 18.5%, p=0.04) and reduced aspirin discontinuation (55.3% vs 76%, p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: