Key result
Adherence to standardized perioperative anticoagulation guidelines shows no difference in thromboembolism or major bleeding.
Why the study?
Temporary interruption of oral anticoagulation and perioperative bridging therapy recommendations exist, but evaluation of adherence and associated bleeding or thromboembolic events in clinical practice is needed.
Does adherence to standardized perioperative anticoagulation guidelines reduce bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients requiring invasive procedures?
Observational (n=294)
Does adherence to standardized perioperative anticoagulation guidelines reduce bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients requiring invasive procedures?
Using a standardized guideline for perioperative management of anticoagulation leads to low rates of thromboembolism and bleeding, with no significant difference in outcomes based on strict provider adherence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports standardized perioperative anticoagulation protocols given low event rates; leaves open whether strict adherence confers additional benefit.
BACKGROUND: In North America, 250,000 patients on vitamin K antagonists require surgical procedures each year. Temporary interruption of oral anticoagulation and perioperative bridging therapy with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin are recommended by the American College of Chest Physicians 2012 for select patients. OBJECTIVES: The study objectives are to evaluate adherence and nonadherence to the Johns Hopkins clinic guidelines for perioperative management of anticoagulation and identify bleeding or thromboembolic events during perioperative management of anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who required perioperative management of anticoagulation for an invasive procedure from May 2009 to March 2014. Individualized perioperative anticoagulation management plans were prospectively developed for each patient according to the standardized Johns Hopkins perioperative bridging recommendations and documented in the medical record. Adherence to these standardized Johns Hopkins clinic guidelines, the incidence of thromboembolic events, and bleeding and adverse events during perioperative management were retrieved from the medical record. RESULTS: In 294 perioperative management cases, there was 1 (0.3%) thromboembolism, 3 (1%) major bleeds, and 21 (7%) minor bleeds. One patient experienced facial swelling after starting enoxaparin. There was no difference in thromboembolic (0 vs 1, P = 1.00), major (1 vs 2, P = 1.00), or minor bleeding (14 vs 7, P = 1.00) events in patients managed by providers who were adherent to guidelines when compared with providers who were nonadherent. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that using a standardized guideline for perioperative management of anticoagulation to inform but not to dictate clinical practice leads to low rates of both thromboembolism and bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lum et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Patients requiring perioperative management of anticoagulation (n=294). Adherence to standardized clinic guidelines for perioperative management of anticoagulation vs. Nonadherence to guidelines was evaluated on Thromboembolic events (p=1.00). Provider adherence to standardized perioperative anticoagulation guidelines showed no significant difference in thromboembolic (0 vs 1, P=1.00) or major bleeding (1 vs 2, P=1.00) vs nonadherence.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: