Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In 1987 the definition of an Rh-negative donor in the Netherlands was changed from C-, E- as well as Du-negative to D-negative only. The use of 2 different strong anti-D sera without an antiglobulin phase (Du test) was considered sufficient to reveal the clinically important D antigen. In applying this policy, we identified 32 donors in 13,500 consecutive blood donations whose indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) (Du)-positive red cells gave negative reactions with at least 2 out of 11 anti-D sera and whose cells might therefore be typed as Rh(-D-)-negative in routine investigations. IgG anti-D used by a one-stage bromelain technique and anti-D with modified IgG appeared to be relatively insensitive in detecting Du in this study. Polyclonal anti-D in an enhancement medium and monoclonal anti-D scored better, although differences exist between the products of various manufacturers. It is suggested that if IAT (Du) testing is omitted, only anti-D sera with a high index of detectability of cells expressing weak D antigens should be accepted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frame et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: