Key result
DL-CCANet and TL-CCANet for multi-lead ECG classification achieved overall accuracies of 95.2% on the MIT-BIH database and up to 95.52% on the INCART database.
Why the study?
Most deep learning algorithm-based CVD diagnosis methods only utilize single-lead ECGs, leaving potential information in other leads unutilized.
The proposed multi-lead deep learning algorithms (DL-CCANet and TL-CCANet) demonstrate high accuracy (>94%) in classifying arrhythmias from noisy ECG data, showing potential for clinical and mobile device application.
Promising accuracies on benchmark databases support automated ECG tools; leaves open clinical adoption without prospective validation.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has become one of the most serious diseases that threaten human health. Over the past decades, over 150 million humans have died of CVDs. Hence, timely prediction of CVDs is especially important. Currently, deep learning algorithm-based CVD diagnosis methods are extensively employed, however, most such algorithms can only utilize one-lead ECGs. Hence, the potential information in other-lead ECGs was not utilized. To address this issue, we have developed novel methods for diagnosing arrhythmia. In this work, DL-CCANet and TL-CCANet are proposed to extract abstract discriminating features from dual-lead and three-lead ECGs, respectively. Then, the linear support vector machine specializing in high-dimensional features is used as the classifier model. On the MIT-BIH database, a 95.2% overall accuracy is obtained by detecting 15 types of heartbeats using DL-CCANet. On the INCART database, overall accuracies of 94.01% (II and V1 leads), 93.90% (V1 and V5 leads) and 94.07% (II and V5 leads) are achieved by detecting seven types of heartbeat using DL-CCANet, while TL-CCANet yields a higher overall accuracy of 95.52% using the above three leads. In addition, all of the above experiments are implemented using noisy ECG data. The proposed methods have potential to be applied in the clinic and mobile devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2019) studied Arrhythmia. DL-CCANet and TL-CCANet was evaluated on Overall accuracy for heartbeat classification. DL-CCANet and TL-CCANet for multi-lead ECG classification achieved overall accuracies of 95.2% on the MIT-BIH database and up to 95.52% on the INCART database.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: