Key result
Combining multiple feature vectors from carotid artery ultrasound images and heart rate variability achieved a cardiovascular disease diagnosing accuracy rate of 89.51% using Support Vector Machine.
Why the study?
Does a prediction model combining feature vectors from carotid artery ultrasound and heart rate variability improve diagnostic accuracy for cardiovascular disease compared to using either alone?
Does a prediction model combining feature vectors from carotid artery ultrasound and heart rate variability improve diagnostic accuracy for cardiovascular disease compared to using either alone?
Combining feature vectors from carotid artery ultrasound and heart rate variability with machine learning algorithms like SVM and CMAR achieves high diagnostic accuracy (~89.5%) for cardiovascular disease.
May support multimodal ML model development for CVD diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
In this paper, we proposed not only an extraction methodology of multiple feature vectors from ultrasound images for carotid arteries (CAs) and heart rate variability (HRV) of electrocardiogram signal, but also a suitable and reliable prediction model useful in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). For inventing the multiple feature vectors, we extract a candidate feature vector through image processing and measurement of the thickness of carotid intima-media (IMT). As a complementary way, the linear and/or nonlinear feature vectors are also extracted from HRV, a main index for cardiac disorder. The significance of the multiple feature vectors is tested with several machine learning methods, namely Neural Networks, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Classification based on Multiple Association Rule (CMAR), Decision tree induction and Bayesian classifier. As a result, multiple feature vectors extracted from both CAs and HRV (CA+HRV) showed higher accuracy than the separative feature vectors of CAs and HRV. Furthermore, the SVM and CMAR showed about 89.51% and 89.46%, respectively, in terms of diagnosing accuracy rate after evaluating the diagnosis or prediction methods using the finally chosen multiple feature vectors. Therefore, the multiple feature vectors devised in this paper can be effective diagnostic indicators of CVD. In addition, the feature vector analysis and prediction techniques are expected to be helpful tools in the decisions of cardiologists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2016) studied Cardiovascular disease. Multiple feature vectors from carotid arteries (CAs) and heart rate variability (HRV) vs. Separative feature vectors of CAs and HRV was evaluated on Diagnosing accuracy rate. Combining multiple feature vectors from carotid artery ultrasound images and heart rate variability achieved a cardiovascular disease diagnosing accuracy rate of 89.51% using Support Vector Machine.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: