Key result
A rapid nomographic method for determining fibrinogen and FDP based on thrombin time showed satisfactory agreement with immunodiffusion results in plasmas of different fibrinogen concentrations.
Why the study?
Does a rapid nomogram-based method using thrombin time accurately determine fibrinogen and FDP levels compared to immunodiffusion in defibrination syndrome?
Does a rapid nomogram-based method using thrombin time accurately determine fibrinogen and FDP levels compared to immunodiffusion in defibrination syndrome?
A rapid nomogram-based method using thrombin time provides a satisfactory estimation of fibrinogen and FDP levels, which may be useful in acute defibrination syndrome and during thrombolytic therapy.
May enable rapid bedside fibrinogen/FDP estimation in acute defibrination; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Summary 1. It was found that effects of deliberate changes in fibrinogen concentration and in the amount of FDP added to the experimental system (containing pure fibrinogen solution and saline- or serumdiluted plasma) could be approximated with satisfactory accuracy by a linear plot of the logarithm of clotting times versus the inverse of fibrinogen concentration. By increasing FDP activity the slope of the obtained lines becomes proportionately steeper. The constants, which interrelate clotting time, fibrinogen concentration and FDP activity, are to be derived experimentally. The obtained formula is expressed also nomographically. 2. Apart from the presence of some very rare anticoagulants, an elongation of thrombin time observed under strictly specified conditions points to a substantial reduction of fibrinogen concentration and/or an interplay of fibrinogen degradation products. If a definite amount of fibrinogen (Fibrinogen sec. Warner Chilcott) is admixed to a pathological plasma, thrombin time in the latter will decrease in a specifiable manner. By entering the original and corrected thrombin time values in the reported nomogram the fibrinogen content and FDP activity of the pathological plasma can be calculated. 3. The described procedure for fibrinogen and FDP assay is suitable first of all in acute defibrination syndrome and at the thrombolytic therapy. Its agreement with the results obtained by immunodiffusion was satisfactory as regards the fibrinogen in plasmas of different fibrinogen concentration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sas et al. (1971) studied Defibrination syndrome. Rapid nomographic method for fibrinogen and FDP assay vs. Immunodiffusion was evaluated on Agreement with immunodiffusion results. A rapid nomographic method for determining fibrinogen and FDP based on thrombin time showed satisfactory agreement with immunodiffusion results in plasmas of different fibrinogen concentrations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: