Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is considerable uncertainty relative to the emissions of N 2 O from legume crops. A study was initiated to quantify N 2 O fluxes from soils cropped to alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) and soybean ( Glycine max L.), and to improve our understanding of soil and climatic factors controlling N 2 O emissions from these crops. Measurements were made on three soils cropped to alfalfa, soybean, or timothy ( Phleum pratense L.), a perennial grass used as a control. In situ soil‐surface N 2 O emissions ( F N2O ) were measured 47 times during the 2001 and 2002 growing seasons. Soil water, NH 4 –N, NO 3 –N, and N 2 O contents, and soil temperature were also determined to explain the variation in gas fluxes. Emissions of N 2 O were small under the grass where very low soil mineral N content probably limited denitrification and N 2 O production. Soil mineral N contents under legumes were up to 10 times greater than under timothy. However, soil mineral N contents and F N2O were not closely related, thus suggesting that the soil mineral N pool alone was a poor indicator of the intensity of N 2 O production processes. Higher F N2O were measured under legume than under timothy in only 6 out of 10 field comparisons (site‐years). Moreover, the emissions associated with alfalfa (0.67–1.45 kg N ha −1 ) and soybean (0.46–3.08 kg N ha −1 ) production were smaller than those predicted using the emission coefficient proposed for the national inventory of greenhouse gases (alfalfa = 1.60–5.21 kg N ha −1 ; soybean = 2.76–4.97 kg N ha −1 ). We conclude that the use of the current emission coefficient may overestimate the N 2 O emissions associated with soybean and alfalfa production in eastern Canada.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rochette et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: